Can existing laws keep up with new technology?

In 2018, a landmark ‘cyborg’ case in NSW highlighted how new technology can challenge existing laws. 

The case involved Biohacker Meow-Ludo Disco Gamma Meow Meow who used an Opal card chip implanted under his skin to tap on and off Sydney’s train network. 

Although the chip held a valid balance, he was initially fined for travelling without a valid ticket on the basis that the implant did not meet the technical requirements of a ‘ticket’ under existing transport laws. The issue wasn’t intent or payment, but whether the law recognised how the technology was used. 

On appeal, the court overturned the conviction, acknowledging the unusual circumstances and the low seriousness of the offence. The case highlighted how laws drafted for everyday situations are sometimes stretched to accommodate emerging technologies. 

At Aubrey Brown Lawyers, we help clients navigate situations where changing circumstances don’t fit neatly within existing rules. Clear advice early can help avoid assumptions that don’t hold up when tested. 

Talk to our team on (02) 4350 3333 or by visiting aubreybrown.com.au.

Share this post

BLOG

Recent posts

Why an equal split in a Will does not guarantee a fair outcome

Many parents assume that dividing an estate equally between their children is the fairest approach they can take. However, treating...

Read Article

Parenting plans versus consent orders: the right framework for your family

Separated parents are often told they need a parenting arrangement in place, without being told that there are two quite...

Read Article

Family Trusts and Estate Planning: the question your Will cannot answer

Most people who hold assets through a family trust understand that the structure offers tax flexibility and asset protection. What...

Read Article

We acknowledge and respect the traditional owners of the land on which we live and work, the Guringai and Darkinjung people.
We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.